Let me be clear — President Obama had designs for his administration early that likely would have bankrupted at least a few Washington DC fine eating/dining establishments.

One of the “feats” of Obama now is that his planned weekly Wednesday Night Feasts for 200-300 politicos got canceled.  I haven’t looked for all my old posts and blogs calling for the President to cease and desist from his plans to host 200-300 politicos every week and not just for it being at tax payer expense - President Obama was treading (in New Hampshire made footware?) to take away at least a third of DC busiest dining night out traffic and allure.

We have to be clear about all this - let me be clear — we have a tough buffet of economic platitudes and spooning now served as our main course for 2012 deciding. 

There is the pedestrian governance of Obama administering that footed an oversimplified talk and walk and one maybe most obvious in its coarseness and nutty clumping with his desired political Wednesday Feast Nights so in DC where weeknights, nights like Wednesday, make or break power hungry diners out hoping to rub elbows and/or tap heels with the seated elected elite.  We have that President Obama may have thought a weekly feast a better feat than more Clinton styled slumber parties, and as a young parent - but as well have that he showed a lack of understanding of DC economics and as well politics.

We have that feat of President Obama now greatest may be that he cancelled his feast plans.  From the earliest days of his administration he had to start learning to govern differently than he thought he would be able to and wise to.  The 200-300 he wanted to host on tax-payer earnings/collections were the clientele that was mostly out of town from Fridays through Sundays and best only to be found maybe out for dinner on Wednesdays and Thursdays, mostly.

Yes, as now - let me be clear - as now we have an economy that had such early days of grandness and elitism about it we have that President Obama could easily have bankrupted at least a few of Washington DC premium eateries.  We have that it may have been of an arrogance too clever by half with an expectation that they could re-write their “down economy” claims magically and then move forward about such too.  We have that Democrats may have manufactured or conjured a “down economy” and maybe with colleges united now in ways protected by CITIZENS UNITED with expression, political, with endowment “shorting.”  We have, let me be clear, that those about Obama and Clintons may have thought they could get away with a fake and convenient economic crisis and then party one, big time - BIG TIME.

Dems were all on a slippery slope with President Obama (and as if President Clinton, otherwise so of same collusion/plans) where they were falsely thinking grandly of great feats - of convenient crisis for “necessary” change - theirs but with a few little very big economic lies.  They seem to have thought they while standing on such a slippery slope would still be able to quickly and suddenly reverse and correct and then move forward with a new historical construct otherwise too irrational to have been considered.  I don’t know about you but I do seem to remember some days back whence they of this Dem set saw a risk too great for their desired feats to foot still the recovery too soon.   I do seem to remember Dem set being afraid to reset economy from their meddling, and, for then their a great risk a foot about such feasting, political, not specifically of Obama’s grand Wednesday Night Feast, maybe more of people wearing through souls of New Hampshire cobbled foot ware.  I do seem to remember that this Dem set wanted to try to reverse the convenient economic slide that brought them to such refreshed “power” holding but then seemingly afraid to for such of too great a risk of self incrimination and exposure for such would have showed themselves of a manufactured and political economic downturn - not magic of personality based leadership or…?

I don’t know which is more concerning today - that President Obama by wanting to host Wednesday Night Feasts weekly showed himself of a lack of pedestrian political basis/understanding or that such was just a ridiculous buffet showing even then a desire to have and serve $100 a serving kobe beef - or what new “speciality” next Wednesday could drizzle to drool - with a detached “political” & “economic” spooning.

All that may have been standing in his way to such a courtly “holding” may have been a DC Restaurant lobby.  He would likely have taken away enough allure and “magic” around the primary Wednesday Night Power Dining scene that at least three top eateries would have closed up or actually gone bankrupt.  But it may be his inability to try to serve a quick “magical” fix to a “new depression” as thought that tanked economy and job creation or saving most, most outside the realm of DC, at least.  We have that colleges united are now in spirit protected by CITIZENS UNITED and now we have more of America protected maybe enough toward 2012 deciding as well by CITIZENS UNITED market expression protections.  All that may be so such is as well considerate for an unlikely alternative in the alternitive Clinton then unacceptable if to fewer or smaller parties/feasts.

President Obama was on a slippery slope that he/they thought they could handle - and not so be of a need to cancel parties - PBO seems to be remembered for being of a fear early before any feat remarkable, but not a commenced feast, that had him afraid to “suddenly” reset our economy out of concern such a hand would spoon and torrent self incriminating - that may still have been able to help the colleges maybe too united in an ideology properly separate enough but not without President Obama or otherwise the alternate “Hillary” becoming political martyrs for their concerns.

We have now - let us be clear - a party of an early arrogance about convenient crisis now inseparable from our consummating a new 2012 deciding.  We have that such was of confidence maybe to much in a con theirs that they then but with a partisan martyring had to avoid a quick and timely fix.   We have that they couldn’t maybe educate on real economics for they had con constructed to alter market behavior or that they were naive and ignorant and so confused.

We have that they may have either in our President Obama or their prepared alternative spooning that was “Hillary” option been expecting to cover-up for the Clintons - blame everything on Bush and Republicans & then suddenly and magically reset sliding economy — but then themselves unable to stick to their ideological plotting without themselves martyring themselves.  We have that even if they had the ability to serve up a quick recovery with new ideological marketing mental reset they then couldn’t without freeing George Bush from their convenient political lies - and throwing themselves either as “leader Obama” or the alternate “Hillary” on their own forked tongued political feat.

So besides that President Obama with his started then canceled Wednesday Night Feasts did show himself of a feat, economic, for a feast canceling feat, and irregardless of how much was actually then to be footed by tax paying hard working citizen people — we have that colleges united in a fairly separate let similar ideology are not most to blame for Democrat leaders inability to quickly fix convenient economic crisis for inconvenient to either “Barack” or “Hillary” is that they could have served themselves up as political martyrs proudly despite and necessary fall and possible incarceration due as the “captain(s)” of such - the POLITICAL CHIEFS that could have fallen so that colleges ideals could still commence reset but otherwise then not too corrupted.

And so, with some reflection:  He could have been great - he could have been great if he could just have un-served or walked away from nonsense that is and was:  “It is all Bush’s fault!!!”?

[Originally post 01/08/12 at http://2012us.jphogan.org]