 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Originally published via http://citizenrosebud.com 5/16/12
HARD TIMES AT CLINTONS’ HIGH? Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: hogan @ 8:29 am
In the legend of Johnny Cash there really is a prison - a Folsom Prison. And yet when you hear how poorly she wears MEMBERS ONLY? ... comes to mind: the thought that some should be landing in measured time.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
First Lady Michelle Obama had a call Herculean and daunting just for the trillions the Clintons’ dietariness was costing.
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton has been more to dressing to Marie Antoinette than to the black of Johnny Cash.
Oh, have you yet considered our times of old - say September 12 , 2001 - and how a then President Barack Hussein Obama would have stepped out?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton did more to encourage a two Big Macs a day habit than the austerity of First Lady Michelle Obama. First Lady Hillary did seem to favor KING OF QUEENS mad dashing to a marketed acceptability of her bubba’s pre-existing condition. First Lady Michelle as otherwise embrace labor and austerity and “twigs” for her hubbie.
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? Can you imagine both in stripes?
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
Prison fare may suit them and even set a better example for all - even better than “twigs” for Lady Obama’s hubbie.
Word is it is costing us a trillion more than it would have - word is the Clintons dietary “leadership” raised weights and related healthcare costs for the past two decades such that a reverse of their guidance could save us a trillion dollars in healthcare costs.
But diabolical more is still the alternate realm and possibility of this President Obama as President Obama circa 9-12-01.
We have that he is a man merely of “twigs” and “arugula” but when his burger is with cheddar, arugula and Dijon mustard. We have that he, President Obama, another of a Hyde Park with wants to New Deal Austerity for all has stayed in character theirs so.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
As you wake up to this thought as if waking now on September 12, 2001 with President Obama in charge of which ever nationalism or new nationalism he might already have worked out with labors, his - would it be stripes for the Clintons, and not the flattering types?
As you wake up to this thought asked in keeping with Obamas now decades still in character consistency so - would it be a call to austerity and apologies and as well a chiding of a suggestion to “please go shopping”?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
Seems we can suggest that the Obamas do only know austerity for others and not in a Johnny Cash black suitedness kindly way.
But as you wake to these thoughts - and stir anew in as much curiosity to intellectual honesty as your habit or hope — President Barack Hussein Obama on a morning of September 12, 2001, left as it was actually whence, but unable to be himself and declare like or exactly: “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
NO! You own this mess???
NO! “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
OK! - SO LET US LOOK BACK AT LEAST THROUGHOUT THE PAST TEN YEARS - BUT LET US BE SMARTER THAN THE 9/11 COMMISSION AND NOT ONLY LOOK BACK TEN YEARS - LET US AT LEAST FINALLY LITIGATE THIS FOR YOU AND LOOK BACK AT LEAST TWELVE YEARS OR BETTER YET TWO DECADES. IT SEEMS YOU DID INHERIT A MESS FROM THE CLINTONS’ 8 OF DANGEROUS ABANDONMENT OF AFGHANS AND IRAQI PEOPLE, IN PRACTICE, AND SUCH AS IT IS OF DANGERS YOU SPOKE TO WITH YOUR NOBEL PRIZE ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WHEN YOU CHIDED YOUR PREDECESSORS SO ABOUT DANGERS OF INACTION AND AVOIDANCE IN FOREIGN POLICIES. YES IT SEEMS A MESS WAS INHERITED FROM THE CLINTONS BUT REALLY IF WE LOOK BACK MORE THAN THE TEN YEARS THAT OUR 9/11 COMMISSION LIMITED ITSELF TO WE CAN BEGIN TO SEE IT ALL MIGHT NOT HAVE HAPPENED BUT FOR SCHEMING OF SADDAM HUSSEIN AND ESPECIALLY THAT RELATED TO HIS INVASION AND HOPES TO KEEP AN ALLY - KUWAIT.
A OK!
“A OK!”???
