 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Originally published via http://citizenrosebud.com 5/14/12
MEMBERS ONLY? Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: hogan @ 7:43 pm
She was big in polyester. Reports have not been substantiated that she chose homespun or sack cloth for her sheik.
e. e. cummings may have spun to worries so for this chic and her twined sheik.
Clemens may have been want to twain more than false outrage at her treatments in sheik to all that might be marked Sheiks.
e. e. cummings lived at least near to the polyester rage and her rise to so much modern riling with threads.
She was big in polyester - she must have been — where otherwise are the reports of sack cloth or homespun for her sheik?
She has dressed down our preamble - it so ordained then in within the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven to only general Welfare.
And yet too Posterity.
And yet too domestic Tranquility.
And yet too a more perfect Union.
Doth they crow ravenous - or?
How would he hath then or now whence to marking our twaining on her threads and her pre-9/11 sheik (Sheik?) - he that e. e. or that Samuel?
She was big in polyester - she must have been. Oh, the THE DOORS - where was her top hat then?
You can petition the Lord with Prayer… You can Petition the Lord with Prayer - like.
Oh how she has dressed down at least our legend and its keying - our Constitution - its preamble.
The scary ware that is her’s of that whence her fashioning is twained and marked as per 9/11.
It wasn’t homespun.
It wasn’t sack cloth.
Members Only? She was big in polyester - was it all about oil? - she had to have been big in polyester.
Where beckon with Edith?
How bombed with Wharton?
Was she a Maud and a gunner?
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It really did take an Afghan village?
It really just take and Afghan village?
Let’s say Taliban - why worry about Al Qaeda!
Members Only? She was big in polyester - was it all about oil? - she had to have been big in polyester.
e. e. cummings may have spun to worries so for this chic and her twined sheik.
Clemens may have been want to twain more than false outrage at her treatments in sheik to all that might be marked Sheiks.
e. e. cummings lived at least near to the polyester rage and her rise to so much modern riling with threads.
She was big in polyester - she must have been — where otherwise are the reports of sack cloth or homespun for her sheik?
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It really did take an Afghan village?
It really just take and Afghan village?
Let’s say Taliban - why worry about Al Qaeda!
in simple cummings or well marked twaining by clemens her sheik fashioning either a rage or THE BOMB.
Back whence when she nearer agent orange than most - how did she sing - how with preamble did she dress down or dress up?
She has dressed down our preamble - it so ordained then in within the
Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven to only
general Welfare.
And yet too Posterity.
And yet too domestic Tranquility.
And yet too a more perfect Union.
Doth they crow ravenous - or?
How doth she mark and wear the sands of time - how stowed? - how on the beach? Was it all about oil - her polyester?
She was big in polyester. Reports have not been substantiated that she chose homespun or sack cloth for her sheik.
And some crow her times they were not ravenous - 9/11 marked - twained - either Clintons’ great success or their…?
